Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ç¥¸é󸮿¡ µû¸¥ °ñÀ¶ÇÕÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ

Comparision of Osseointegration Depending on Surface Treatment

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 34±Ç 4È£ p.699 ~ 709
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ȲÇÏÁØ ¹ÚÁغÀ/±Ç¿µÇõ/ÇãÀÍ

Abstract


The present study was performed to evaluate histomorphological difference in various surface-treated implants in beagle. Implants(Implantium¢ç, Dentium Co. Korea) with pure titanium machined surface, acid treated surface, and Al2O3(50~100¥ìm)blasted with acid treated surface were used in this study. All mandibular premolars of 1.5~2 year old male beagle dogs were extracted. At 3 months after extraction, the implants(¥Õ 4mm, l 6mm) were installed. The beagle were sacrificed at 1, 3 months after installation and then tissues including implants were prepared for non-decalcified specimens. These specimens were analyzed comparatively under light microscope.

The results of this study were as follow

1. Higher rate of osseointegration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100¥ìm)blasted with acid-treated surface.

2. Increased osseointegration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100¥ìm)blasted with acidtreated surface with time.

3. Higher maturation of integration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100¥ìm)blasted with acid-treated surface.

In conclusion, surface treatment of Al2O3blasted with acid might be considered to shorten healing time and improve success rate as increasing contact of implant and bone.

Å°¿öµå

surface-treated implant; pure titanium machined surface acid treated surface; Al2O3(50~100¥ìm) blasted with acid treated surface

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI